Legal Opinion

Hermanson v. Hermanson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1994No. 25113PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Cindy Hermanson (“Cindy”), the biological mother of James Hermanson (“James”), appeals from a district court order finding that David Hermanson (“David”) is the father of James. Cindy and David married when Cindy was six months pregnant with James in June, 1982. Cindy maintains that she informed David that she was pregnant with another man’s child. David admits that Cindy never told him that he was the father of her unborn child.

James was born on October 12, 1982. The parties agree that things did not go well after James’s birth. Cindy stated that for the three years following James’s…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. State Employment Security Department v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Ferdie Sievers, Etc. v. Diversified Mortg.Nevada Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Topaz Mutual Co. v. MarshNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Cheqer, Inc. v. Painters & Decorators Joint Committee, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Russo v. GardnerNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Osterkamp v. StilesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. In the Matter of Terminating Parental Rights (father)Idaho Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. NGUYEN VS. BOYNES (CHILD CUSTODY)Nevada Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API