Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Welfare Division of the Department of Human Resources v. Vine

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1983No. 13727, 14264PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, J.:

In these cases the State of Nevada seeks to establish that an order terminating parental rights does not by operation of law also terminate a parent’s obligation of child support. In light of the interlocking nature of parental rights and responsibilities, and the intention of the Legislature as evidenced by the legislative scheme, we construe the term “parental rights” to include both parental rights and parental obligations. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the district court in both Case No. 13727 and Case No. 14264.

THE FACTS

John M. Vine and Martha Jo…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moffat v. MoffatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Anguis v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Sernaker v. EhrlichNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Chapman v. ChapmanNevada Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. FritzSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  2. Knox v. DickNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  3. M.D.C. v. K.D.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. McCabe v. McCabeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. Frye v. FryeNevada Supreme Court · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API