State Ex Rel. Welfare Division of the Department of Human Resources v. Vine
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Mowbray, J.:
In these cases the State of Nevada seeks to establish that an order terminating parental rights does not by operation of law also terminate a parent’s obligation of child support. In light of the interlocking nature of parental rights and responsibilities, and the intention of the Legislature as evidenced by the legislative scheme, we construe the term “parental rights” to include both parental rights and parental obligations. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the district court in both Case No. 13727 and Case No. 14264.
THE FACTS
John M. Vine and Martha Jo…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moffat v. MoffatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Anguis v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Sernaker v. EhrlichNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Chapman v. ChapmanNevada Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. FritzSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Knox v. DickNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- M.D.C. v. K.D.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- McCabe v. McCabeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Frye v. FryeNevada Supreme Court · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.