Legal Opinion

Russo v. Gardner

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1998No. 29758PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

FACTS

The relationship between appellant Deborah Russo (“Russo”) and respondent John J. Gardner (“Gardner”) began sometime in 1989. Their relationship was tumultuous; Gardner moved in and out several times before 1991. During one of the times Gardner was not living with her, Russo conceived a child by another man after a “one night stand.”

The child, named Zachary C. Gardner-Russo (“Zachary”), was born on May 15, 1992. At that time, Gardner was not living with Russo. However, about two weeks after Zachary was born, Gardner moved back to the home, and his relationship with Russo…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. MurphyNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  2. McGlone v. McGloneNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Frye v. FryeNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Litz v. BennumNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Magiera v. LueraNevada Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. St. Mary v. DamonNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. IN RE: ESTATE OF ROBERT C. MURRAYNevada Supreme Court · 2015
  3. IN RE: ESTATE OF ROBERT C. MURRAYNevada Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API