Legal Opinion

Sargeant v. Sargeant

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1972No. 6567PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*225OPINION

By the Court,

Zenoff, C. J.:

The parties to this appeal were married September 25, 1940 and resided in Florida for the majority of their married life. *226The day before the marriage the parties voluntarily executed an antenuptial agreement whereby they agreed that their separate property would remain separate. It must be noted that it is apparent from the record that Matilda Sargeant was not aware nor permitted to be aware of the agreement’s significance. At the time of the marriage Harry Sargeant was worth $285,000, but at the time of the divorce his net worth was $3,000,000. He managed…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. People v. SorensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Fuller v. FullerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Sweeley v. SweeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Bower v. LandaNevada Supreme Court · 1962

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. FletcherNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Miller v. WilfongNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Egan v. Lang (In Re Lang)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1981
  4. Pierce v. PierceMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Ross v. RossNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API