State v. Elliott

[¶ 1] Mark Elliott appeals from judgments of conviction of stalking (Class D), 17-A M.R.S. § 210-A(1)(A)(1) (2007) (amended 2008), 1 and violating a protective order (Class D), 19-A M.R.S. § 4011(1) (2009), 2 entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Wamn, J.) after a jury trial. Elliott makes a number of arguments, 3 but we address only the following: (1) whether evidence of his use of the roads was inadmissible because the stalking statute’s definition of a “course of conduct” excludes the exercise of the constitutional right to travel; (2) whether the court erred in instructing the…