Legal Opinion

Everly Enterprises Inc. v. Altman

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1960No. L. A. No. 25429PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

In these two causes, consolidated for trial and for appeal, George T. Altman appeals from an adverse judgment granting plaintiffs-respondents1 declaratory relief against him and denying his sought-for rescission and cancellation of certain instruments. We have concluded, for reasons hereinafter stated, that, although the trial court correctly decided that Altman is entitled to no relief against plaintiffs, the judgment should he modified to provide that Altman may retain, rather than be divested of, the security evidenced by the fourth trust deed described in the pleadings and judgment, and,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Damiani v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Chandler v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Blache v. BlacheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bambridge v. WestermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. McKinny v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Billington v. Interinsurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Dimmick v. DimmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Rebney v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API