Rebney v. Wells Fargo Bank
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENSON, Acting P. J.
I. Introduction
These appeals challenge the settlement of class action litigation arising from the assessment of various bank checking account fees.
According to the parties, the appeals are about either collusion or fantasy. Appellants contend the settlements were the product of a collusive sellout between class counsel and the banks. Respondents claim the appeals are attributable to appellants’ fantasy vision of wondrously large money judgments.
From our perspective, at least, the parties are each wrong. To us, these appeals are about appellate standing, the lack of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cotton v. HintonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Wershba v. Apple Computer, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- California Grocers Assn. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Dunk v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.