Legal Opinion

Ruttenburg, Exr. v. Fire Ins. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1936No. Appeals, 209, 210 and 211PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

Charles Ruttenberg had insured his building, store stock and fixtures with fourteen different fire insurance companies. On December 1, 1931, tbe building and its contents were destroyed by fire. He brought these three actions of assumpsit against three of the insurance companies involved to recover on the policies covering the building and personal property destroyed. The insured died after suit had been instituted, and his executor was substituted as plaintiff in each case. The three actions were tried together. The policies were of the standard form, and each contained…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. McMillen v. SteeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Wilhelm v. UttenweilerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Donahue v. Punxsutawney BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Brown v. SchockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Maravich v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Mele v. All-Star Ins. Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Sperrazza v. Cambridge Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Elinor M. Ratay v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API