Legal Opinion

Donahue v. Punxsutawney Borough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1929No. Appeal, 78PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

The Mahoning Creek extends westerly through the Borough of Punxsutawney and the land of the plaintiff, William Donahue, abuts upon the north side thereof. Adjoining his land to the west is that of Richard L. L. Davis, which also abuts on the creek for several hundred feet. Water Street, extending along the north side of the creek and near the bank thereof, had its western terminus, for many years, in plaintiff’s land and seventy-nine feet from his west line. The borough, by ordinance duly approved December 2, 1922, purported to extend Water Street westerly…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dawson v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. McSorley v. Avalon Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. City of Pittsburg v. Epping-Carpenter Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Pittsburgh, Bradford & Buffalo Railway Co. v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  5. Edwards v. StranghellanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. Pennsylvania Sports & Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Narciso v. Mauch Chunk TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Bodman v. BodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Goldberg v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Curry v. WillsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API