Legal Opinion
County of Sacramento v. Loeb
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 27, 1984No. Civ. 22891PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARR, Acting P. J.
In these consolidated proceedings, respondent state officers and agencies (hereafter the State) appeal from the granting of a peremptory writ of mandate to plaintiffs County of Sacramento and the County of Alameda (hereafter the Counties). The dispute centers on the Counties’ claims against the State for amounts concededly underpaid in previous fiscal years for the State’s share of expenditures under the Short-Doyle Act. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5600 et seq.) The writ issued by the superior court is three-fold: (1) it compels the director of State Department of Mental…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Mandel v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Sanders v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carmel Valley Fire Protection v. State of Calif.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Cornelius v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- City of San Diego v. Board of Trustees of the California State UniversityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Alameda County Management Employees Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.