Legal Opinion

Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1990No. A046789PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

This action arises out of long-standing litigation between the Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association (Bank) and real parties in interest Irene O’Connell Kruse, George M. Jewell and Laura E. Jewell, and George R. Jewell (collectively Jewells), apple growers/brokers and processors in Sonoma County. In Kruse v. Bank of America (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 38, Division One of this court reversed a jury verdict in favor of real parties for insufficiency of the evidence. When the trial court denied the Bank’s subsequent request for entry of judgment and granted real…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Kruse v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. McCoy v. Hearst Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Frank v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Saari v. Jongordon Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API