Legal Opinion
Smith v. Seamless Rubber Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 30, 1930PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
The plaintiff had for many years been employed in the city of New Haven by the defendant employer, hereinafter called the company. In Janu'ary, 1928, the city was threatened with an epidemic of smallpox. The board of health recommended that its residents submit themselves to vaccination and very many did so. The company posted a notice in its plant as follows: “We naturally desire to assist the Board of Health in their efforts to prevent a smallpox epidemic in New Haven and vicinity. Therefore, we are arranging so that you may be vaccinated without any charge to yourself at our hospital today…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Mann v. Glastonbury Knitting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Stakonis v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Mascika v. Connecticut Tool & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Wilder v. Russell Library Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- McNamara v. Town of HamdenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Mann v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Maher v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Alewine v. Tobin Quarries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- Spatafore v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.