Legal Opinion

Amalgamated Casualty Ins. Co. v. Winslow

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 10, 1943No. 8317PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

Appellee Winslow recovered judgment in the Municipal Court of the District of Columbia against Fred Elliott for personal injuries caused by the negligent operation of Elliott’s taxicab. Appellee docketed this judgment in the United States District Court and garnisheed two insurance companies, Pennsylvania Casualty and Amalgamated Casualty. The District Court gave judgment against both garnishees and directed that if either “pays more than one-half of the judgment, with interest and costs, it shall recover of the other garnishee all sums paid over and above one-half…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Gerseta Corporation v. Equitable Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. MosesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Gratopp v. Carde Stamping & Tool Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Eurich v. General Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bennett v. The Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  2. Lewis MacH. Co. v. Aztec Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  3. Ohran v. National Automobile Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. H. Max Ammerman v. Lou MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API