Legal Opinion
Aetna Life Insurance v. Moses
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 9, 1933No. 137PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
Roberts, an employee of petitioner Bralove, was killed in the course of his employment, by the alleged negligence of respondent. His widow, who was also his administratrix, claimed and has accepted an award of compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (March 4, 1927, c. 509, 44 Stat. 1924), made applicable as a workmen’s compensation law in the District of Columbia by Act of May 17, 1928, c. 612, 45 Stat. 600. The award directed the employer and petitioner, The Aetna Life Insurance Company, his insurer, 1 to pay compensation to the widow in periodic…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hall & Long v. Railroad Cos.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Hooker Electrochemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Czaplicki v. the Hoegh SilvercloudSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Paxos v. Jarka CorporationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- George M. Brewster & Son, Inc. v. Catalytic Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Chapman v. HoageSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.