Legal Opinion
Wojcik v. Aluminum Co. of America
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1959PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRegis O’Brien, J.
This is a motion for an order to dismiss the first cause of action of the plaintiff, Joseph Wojcik, individually, as alleged in paragraphs First through Thirteenth of the complaint. It is made under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, upon the ground that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action. Defendant claims that the plaintiff’s exclusive remedy is under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.
There is also a motion before the court for an order to dismiss the cause of action of the plaintiff, Caroline Wojcik, the wife of plaintiff, Joseph Wojcik, as alleged in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Volk v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Skillings v. AllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Siegel v. . Spear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Bradshaw v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Pittman v. Upjohn Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Bishop v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.