Legal Opinion

State v. Apolo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 9, 1994No. 10-91-09952; CA A75847PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for first degree theft. ORS 164.055. He contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence that was seized at his residence during the execution of a search warrant. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute. Defendant owns two 1987 Mercedes Benz 560 SL automobiles, one silver and one gold. He obtained theft insurance for both vehicles through Allstate Insurance Company. Shortly thereafter, he reported to Allstate that the silver Mercedes had been stolen. Pursuant to company policy, Gary Ford, an Allstate claims adjuster, and Gary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ChezemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. StraileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API