Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 5, 2003No. C001737CR, C001736CR, C001735CR A113546 (Control), A113547, A113639PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

At issue in these consolidated cases is the sufficiency of an affidavit in support of warrants authorizing the search of two residences, one of defendant Michael Barkau and the other of defendants Allen Johnson and Shannon Johnson. The searches led to the discovery of evidence of marijuana grow operations at both houses. Defendants moved to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the searches of those residences. The trial court denied the motions and defendants were convicted of various drug-related offenses. We conclude that the affidavit was sufficient as to the Barkau residence and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. CharlesworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. TompkinsNebraska Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API