Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 6, 2010No. CR060302, A135857PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

Defendant, who was convicted of possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894, argues on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence found during a warrantless search of his car. In particular, defendant argues that the trial court erred in concluding that probable cause existed to support the search. As explained below, we conclude that the trial court properly denied suppression. Accordingly, we affirm.

We state the facts consistently with the trial court’s explicit and implicit findings and determine “whether the trial court applied legal principles correctly…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. MontigueOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. CarlileOregon Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. SundermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. HebrardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. Van OsdolCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. State v. LoraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API