Legal Opinion

Thurston v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1904No. Docket No. 18PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Douglas A. Thurston against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action was brought to recover for injuries sustained by plaintiff while a passenger in one of defendant’s cars. The injury resulted from a collision of the car with a heavy ice wagon at the intersection of Beaubien and Montcalm streets. The negligence counted on was running the car at too high a speed, and failure to have or bring the car under control, so as to prevent the collision. The circuit judge, at the close of the plaintiff’s testimony, on motion of defendant, directed a verdict in its favor. The plaintiff brings error.

It is contended that the law requires of carriers of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Bradley v. Fort Wayne & Elmwood Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Werbowlsky v. Fort Wayne & Elmwood Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Gardner v. Detroit Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Stoody v. Detroit, Grand Rapids & Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Sewell v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Capital Transit Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  4. Line v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Congdon v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API