Legal Opinion

Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 27, 1989No. C2-89-190PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

After appellant Independent School District No. 11 (Anoka-Hennepin School District) refused to reinstate respondent Kristine Dokmo from her voluntary extended leave of absence, Dokmo commenced a declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that she was a substitute teacher during her leave, and requesting reinstatement, lost benefits, and damages. On appeal from partial summary judgment in Dokmo’s favor, the District argues that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and erred in finding that Dokmo worked as a substitute. We affirm.

FACTS

Kristine Dokmo…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Foesch v. Independent School District No. 646Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Strand v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API