Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1898PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From Washington : Thos. A. McBride, Judge. Suit by William Vaughn against James M. Smith and another. From a decree dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This is a suit to cancel a deed to real property, and to recover the consideration paid, and the value of improvements made thereon. The substance of the complaint is that defendants, on April 9, 1890, in consideration of the payment of $2,000, sold and (by a deed containing a covenant of warranty against incumbrances) conveyed to plaintiff a tract of land in Washington County, Oregon, containing fourteen and three-fourths acres, which they fraudulently represented to him was free from incumbrance, and, having no knowledge of the falsity of such statement, he relied thereon, and was induced…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scott v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Frink v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Bullitt v. FarrarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Clarno v. GraysonOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Woodruff v. GarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1866

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Milton v. HareOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Cooper v. Hillsboro Garden TractsOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Whitney v. BissellOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Jeffreys v. WeeklyOregon Supreme Court · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API