Legal Opinion
Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 4, 1967No. 40236PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
On November 18,1964, the Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Company instituted a declaratory judgment action to have an auto insurance policy, issued to defendant Rev. Harvey Anderson in July 1962, rescinded because of alleged misrepresentations in the application for the policy. After a trial by the court, judgment dismissing the complaint was entered. This appeal is from that judgment.
The action was based upon Minn. St. 60.85, which provides:
“No oral or written misrepresentation made by the assured, or in his behalf, in the negotiation of insurance, shall be deemed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oil Base, Inc. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Olinger Mutual Benefit Association v. ChristySupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Calhoun v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Nielsen v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Erickson v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Northern States Power Co. v. Lyon Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Marriage of Gully v. GullySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Dufrane v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Transamerican Insurance Co. v. Austin Farm Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.