Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Allstate Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 30, 1954No. 33005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, District Judge.

This is an action to recover upon an automobile insurance policy issued by the defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, to the plaintiff, Oscar F. Erickson. The defendant seeks to avoid liability by de daring the policy void from the date of issuance because of the alleged falsity of a material representation made by the plaintiff in the policy,'which alleged false representation was relied upon by the defendant in issuing the policy to the plaintiff.

The representation in question is one of the printed “Declarations” on the “Supplement Page” of the policy, and reads as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Island v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Farmers Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. CalkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Woodman v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Strong v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Ashley v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1958
  4. Dariano v. BLOCKSOMSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Strong v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API