Legal Opinion

Oil Base, Inc. v. Transport Indemnity Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1956No. Docket Nos. 21152, 21158PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSB (Paul), J. pro tem. *

actions for declaratory relief both involve the interpretation to be placed upon the same policies of insurance. The cases were consolidated for the purposes of the trial, but separate findings of fact and judgments were entered in each action.

Hereinafter the first case named in the title will be called the Oil Base action; and the second one, the Scherer action.

In the Scherer action plaintiff, by his complaint, sought to have it declared that he was an insured under the policies of insurance issued by each of the insurance companies who is a defendant, and was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Oregon Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  5. Air Transport Manufacturing Co. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Olympic Insurance v. Employers Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Jarrett v. AllState InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API