Legal Opinion
Heninger v. Foremost Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 1985No. B010486PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EAGLESON, J.
—In this case we consider the question whether appellant states a Royal Globe cause of action for alleged violations of Insurance Code section 790.03, subdivision (h), paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (7) and (13), when he does not plead that there has been a final determination of the insured’s liability. We conclude that he does not.
Facts
In a second amended complaint appellant alleged that he was a resident of the Thunderbird Mobile Home Park (Park) in Pomona, California. The Park was insured by Foremost Insurance Company (respondent). A severe storm occurred on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Rodriguez v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Nationwide Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Williams v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Afuso v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
3Cited by12 opinions
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. David L. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Bodenhamer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Green v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.