Legal Opinion

Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 13, 1992No. 910436-CAPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

Appellants Curtis B. Campbell and Inez Preece Campbell appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The pivotal issue raised by this appeal is whether State Farm’s eventual payment of the excess judgment rendered against the Campbells in a suit by a third party bars the Camp-bells’ claim that State Farm acted in bad faith by earlier refusing to settle the claim within the policy limits. We hold that it does not bar the Campbells’ claim and, accordingly, reverse and remand for further…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. V. Ray Summers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Allstate Insurance v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. STATE EX REL. ALLSTATE INS. v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API