Legal Opinion
Nationwide Insurance v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1982No. Civ. 27404PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
Petitioner Nationwide Insurance Company, defendant in the action below, demurred generally to the plaintiff’s complaint, moved for judgment on the pleadings and, alternatively, for abatement of the action. Its demurrer was overruled; its motion for abatement was denied; the motion for judgment on the pleadings was not ruled upon. Contending that these rulings were plainly contrary to law, Nationwide petitioned this court for a writ of mandate. We issued an alternative writ, and the matter is now before us for decision. We have concluded that Nationwide’s contentions are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Doser v. Middlesex Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Nation v. NationWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a California Corporation v. City of Lodi, California, Jack Sieglock, in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lodi Richard Prima, Jr., in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Randall A. Hays, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi City Attorney Michael C. Donovan, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Adam L. Babich, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Steven H. Doto, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Bret A. Stone, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney John R. Till, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Zevnik, Horton, Guibord and McGovern Llp, Individually and in Their Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorneys Fran E. Forkas, in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650, Unigard Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation Unigard Security Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation v. City of LodiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Rodriguez v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Purdy v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.