Legal Opinion
Bodenhamer v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 1987No. A034608PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ANDERSON, P. J.
On November 26, 1981, petitioners’ jewelry store, Bodenhamer Jewelers, in Danville was burglarized resulting in a substantial loss to petitioners’ stock in trade and to pieces of their customers’ jewelry. Petitioners filed suit against their insurers, among others, alleging bad faith in handling claims arising from the burglary. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, one of the insurers and real party in interest herein, had issued a special business owners policy providing coverage for business interruption loss and coverage for claims asserted against petitioners…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Xebec Development Partners, Ltd. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- J.B. Aguerre, Inc. v. American Guarantee & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Dalrymple v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Zephyr Park, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.