Legal Opinion
McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 28, 1947No. 755PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
In an earlier phase of this patent infringement suit a patent owned by respondent Kammerer was held valid and infringed by the petitioner. An accounting for profits and damages was ordered. 39 F. Supp. 213. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. 138 F. 2d 482. We granted certiorari to consider whether a license agreement between respondents Kammerer and Baash-Ross contained restrictions which were contrary to public policy and unlawful so as to bar recovery against petitioner. On oral argument of the case here it developed that no findings of fact had been made by the District Court on this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bowman v. LoperenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kammerer Corp. v. McCulloughDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re Calmar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Mendenhall v. Barber-Greene Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Robert Bosch, Llc v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., in No. 75--1162 v. Carlisle Corporation, in No. 75--1163Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Rex L. BrunsingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.