Legal Opinion
In Re Calmar, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 9, 1988No. 20-1087PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and MICHEL, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
Calmar, Inc. (Calmar) petitions for writ of mandamus to direct the United States District Court for the Central District of California to vacate its May 4, 1988 order. Waynesboro Textiles, Inc. (Waynesboro) opposes the petition. Calmar moves for leave to file a reply.
BACKGROUND
This matter stems from a discussion that took place during a conference with the district court on February 1, 1988:
Mr. Ames [Counsel for Calmar]: Your Honor, the courts have recognized that— if you…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re Innotron DiagnosticsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation. The City of Long Beach, as Trustee for the State of California State of California, on Behalf of Itself and All Political Subdivisions and Special Districts Within the State Similarly Situated State of Florida, Ex Rel. Jim Smith, Attorney General State of Oregon, on Behalf of Itself, Its Residents and All Political Subdivisions Within the State Similarly Situated State of Washington, on Behalf of Itself and Its Public Entities and Residents and State of Arizona v. Standard Oil Company of California Amerada Hess Corporation Cities Services Company and Cities Service Oil Company Conoco, Inc. Getty Oil Company Gulf Oil Corporation Powerline Oil Company Standard Oil Company of Indiana and Ohio Sun Oil Company, Inc. Atlantic Richfield Company Mobil Oil Corporation Phillips Petroleum Company Exxon Corporation Shell Oil Company Texaco, Inc. And Union Oil Company of California, and Leroy K. Cheney Charles F. Temme Milford E. Tracy Clinton E. Kelley L. John Gandsey and Ralf Eckles, Third Party Deponents-Appellants. Mobil Oil Corporation Exxon Corporation Leroy K. Cheney Ralf Eckles L. John Gandsey Clinton E. Kelley Charles F. Temme Milford E. Tracy Union Oil Company of California Howard K. Said and Brobeck, Phleger and Harrison v. The United States District Court for the Central District of California, State of California, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Mississippi Chemical Corporation v. Swift Agricultural Chemicals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
3Cited by133 opinions
- In Re TS Tech USA Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- In Re EMC CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- In Re Echostar Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- In Re the Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- In Re Link_A_Media Devices Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.