Legal Opinion
Kammerer Corp. v. McCullough
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 7, 1941No. 751-YPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
This cause, in equity, was originally brought by the owners of Letters Patent No. 1,277,600, 1,625,391 and 1,625,414,— all devices relating to tools for cutting and removing pipe from wells. Before the trial, the case was consolidated with another one pending before me between the same parties and relating to Letters Patent No. 1,625,391 and 1,625,414 only.
At the trial, Letters Patent No. 1,277,-600 and No. 1,625,414 were eliminated by the plaintiffs. So that the only issues tried were the validity and infringement of Letters Patent No. 1,625,391.
On the evidence…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pointer v. Six Wheel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- The Coleman Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Holly Manufacturing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Byron Jackson Co. v. WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.