Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 2, 1945No. 46PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case both the District Court and the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit have held valid and infringed the Reilly and Stone Patent, No. 1,625,391, of April 19, 1927, for a pipe cutting tool, of which patent respondent Kammerer Corporation is assignee. The patent expired on April 18, 1944, only damage for infringement is involved, and there is no conflict of decision with respect to the patent. This Court granted certiorari only because the petition for certiorari presented as a ground of defense to the suit, that respondent Kammerer Corporation had licensed to respondent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Burnet v. Commonwealth Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Zellerbach Paper Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Duignan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. ShannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. De Luca v. Atlantic Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. Rice v. Sioux City Memorial Park Cemetery, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. McCullough v. Kammerer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API