Standard Fashion Co. v. Cummings
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Murphy, J. Assumpsit by the Standard Fashion Company, a foreign corporation, against Mary E. Cummings upon a special agreement. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The plaintiff, a New York corporation, brought suit in assumpsit in justice’s court, declaring orally on all the common counts, and specially on the contract hereinafter set forth. Defendant pleaded the general issue. From a judgment for defendant, after *197a trial upon the merits, plaintiff appealed to the circuit court. Plaintiff’s case upon trial in the circuit court was substantially as follows: Prior to .January 23, 1907, plaintiff had sold to I. Jay Cummings, who owned and conducted a retail store at Paw Paw, Mich., a stock of paper patterns amounting to $150, of which $75 remained unpaid.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Showen v. J. L. Owens Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Rough v. BreitungMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Neyens v. WorthingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Imperial Curtain Co. v. JacobMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Mathews Conveyer Co. v. Palmer-Bee Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- State v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- Power Specialty Co. v. Michigan Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Michigan Lubricator Co. v. Ontario Cartridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.