Imperial Curtain Co. v. Jacob
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by the Imperial Curtain Company against Ben. B. Jacob and Sol. Sallan, copartners as the Reliable Pawnbrokers, on a contract for advertising. A judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by defendants on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is an action of assumpsit brought to recover the amount alleged to be due for printing, placing, and maintaining an advertisement by the plaintiff on, the street curtain of the Gayety Theater, Detroit. The; advertisement was solicited by a traveling agent of the plaintiff on May 5, 1907, who sent the contract to the ¿tome office of the plaintiff, in Philadelphia, for approval. The contract was as follows:
“ No payments to be made to agents except upon written. *74authority. Verbal understandings or agreements will not he recognized.
“Imperial Curtain Company,
“737 Walnut Street, Philadelphia.
“I…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Milan Milling, etc., Co. v. GortenTennessee Supreme Court · 1894
- Rough v. BreitungMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Haughton Elevator & Machine Co. v. Detroit Candy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Garton v. Union City National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Pittsburgh Const. Co. v. West Side Belt R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Puffer Manufacturing Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Rex Beach Pictures Co. v. Harry I. Garson ProductionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Lake States Engineering Corp. v. Lawrence Seaway Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Loveland v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Power Specialty Co. v. Michigan Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.