Michigan Lubricator Co. v. Ontario Cartridge Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Arthur J. Tuttle, Judge. Action by the Ontario Cartridge Company, Limited, against the Michigan Lubricator Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
In September, 1915, the Ontario Cartridge Company, an Ontario corporation, as purchaser, and the Michigan Lubricator Company, a Michigan corporation, as manufacturer and vendor, entered into a contract for the manufacture and sale of a large quantity o£ brass parts for primers, which were then to be completely assembled and loaded by the Ontario Company, and then to be sold to the Ediiystone Company, and by it used in its business of making artillery shells for the Russian government. The contract was not carried out—no complete parts (except for test) having ever been,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Empire Fuel Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Imperial Curtain Co. v. JacobMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Haughton Elevator & Machine Co. v. Detroit Candy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Le Sueur v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Pickthall v. Anaconda Copper Min. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Mayer v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Myer Feinstein Co. v. De VincentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Bay City v. FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.