Legal Opinion
Carper v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 24, 1953PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The specific question in this case is whether the unemployment commissioner was justified in denying benefits to the plaintiffs after July 18,1949, on the ground that their unemployment was caused by a labor dispute which was not a lockout. The same issue was involved in Almada v. Administrator, 137 Conn. 380, 381, 77 A.2d 765, and Assif v. Administrator, 137 Conn. 393, 77 A.2d 772.
No correction of the finding can be made which will advantage the plaintiffs. An agreement was entered into between the Waterbury Watch Workers’ Union, American Federation of Labor, hereinafter mlled the union, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barnes v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Almada v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Homer Laughlin China Co. v. HixWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
- Assif v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
3Cited by12 opinions
- Guevara v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Bartlett v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Sunstar Foods, Inc. v. UhlendorfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Imperial Laundry, Inc. v. Connecticut State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Anthony v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.