Legal Opinion

Homer Laughlin China Co. v. Hix

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1946No. 9779PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Haymond, Judge:

This controversy presents the question whether the respondent and claimant, Floyd B. Jividen, an employee of the petitioner, The Homer Laughlin China Company, a corporation, who voluntarily ceased to work for his employer during and because of a strike which the petitioner and the respondent both admit was conducted without the requisite authority of a national labor union, and which resulted in a stoppage of work at the .factory of. the company, is entitled, under the unemployment compensation law of this State, to unemployment benefits during the period of his unemployment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Sands Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Miners in General Group v. HixWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Iron Molders' Union No. 125 of Milwaukee v. Allischalmers Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lee-Norse Co. v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Sakrison v. PierceArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Davis v. HixWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Marathon Electric Manufacturing Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Almada v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API