Legal Opinion
Bartlett v. Administrator
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 27, 1955PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiffs, employees of the defendant Landers, Frary and Clark, hereinafter referred to as the employer, made claim for unemployment benefits for the period from March 20,1953, to April 17,1953. The unemployment commissioner concluded that their unemployment during that period was due to the existence of a labor dispute at the employer’s plant and that they were ineligible for bene fits. Upon appeal by the plaintiffs, the Superior Court rendered judgment dismissing the appeal and affirming the commissioner’s decision. From that judgment the plaintiffs and the defendant employer have…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lanyon v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Almada v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Johnson v. PrattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Brown Shoe Co. v. GordonIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
- Kenmike Theatre, Inc. v. Moving Picture Operators, Local 304Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Cicala v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Guevara v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.