Legal Opinion

Assif v. Administrator

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 2, 1951PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.

The decision of this case turns upon the question whether the unemployment for which the plaintiffs seek benefits was the result of a lockout within the meaning of that word as it is used in our Unemployment Compensation Act.

The facts found by the unemployment commissioner may be summarized as follows: The plaintiffs were employees of the Manufacturers’ Foundry Company, hereinafter referred to as the company, which operated a gray iron foundry in Waterbury. Local 251 of the Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, hereinafter referred to as the iinion, was the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sunstar Foods, Inc. v. UhlendorfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Hessler v. American Television & Radio Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Smittle v. GatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Carper v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  5. Anthony v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API