Legal Opinion
United States v. Chaudhry
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 3, 2011No. 09-10381PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the question of whether we have appellate jurisdiction to review a district court’s decision not to impose a provisional sentence until the defendant is competent to be sentenced. We conclude that we lack appellate jurisdiction and dismiss the appeal.
I
Mohammad Yousuf Chaudhry was convicted on sixteen counts related to tax fraud. He submitted an ex parte application to continue sentencing so that he could undergo a psychiatric examination, although competency had not been an issue to that point.
Chaudhry’s doctor reported that Chaudhry had a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Sakhawat Ullah, Jr., United States of America v. Mary Katherine Gosho-KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Douglas DecincesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Martinez-HaroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Paul Davis, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Douglas DecincesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Douglas DecincesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.