Legal Opinion
United States v. Martinez-Haro
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 22, 2011No. 10-4166PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Rigoberto Martinez-Haro was indicted with two counts of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. Before trial, MartinezHaro’s counsel requested that a psychiatric examination be performed on Martinez-Haro to determine his mental competency to stand trial, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(b). Dr. O’Connor performed a psychiatric examination and concluded that Martinez-Haro was likely not competent to stand trial. But Dr. O’Con-nor also recommended more “psychological and neuropsychological testing in Spanish by a Spanish speaking…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Billy G. ByersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Merrill Scott & Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Mohamed v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. GamarraCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Fiorisce v. Colorado Technical UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.