United States v. Sakhawat Ullah, Jr., United States of America v. Mary Katherine Gosho-Kim
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Sakhawat Ullah and Mary Katherine Gosho-Kim appeal their convictions on counts of transporting illegal aliens within the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Among other things, Ullah and Gosho-Kim contend that the district court improperly empaneled a fourteen-person jury and permitted it to deliver a nonunanimous guilty verdict. They are correct. 1
During jury selection, the district court chose fourteen people — twelve jurors and two alternates — to serve as Ullah and Gosho-Kim’s jury. In the course of the two-week trial, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Servando Reyes-Alvarado, United States of America v. Martin Gonzalez-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Eric J. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Riverside-Linden Investment Co., Debtor. Ralph O. Boldt, Trustee Estes & Hoyt v. Kathryn Crake Earl HaferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by227 opinions
- AE Ex Rel. Hernandez v. County of TulareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Williams v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Harold Hall v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Jorge Ibarra-Flores v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Kelly Koerner v. George A. GrigasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
222 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.