Gunn v. Gunn
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAASSEN, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A divorcing couple disputed the nature of their marital interest in a limited Hability company. They eventually agreed that the husband would retain the ownership interest but the wife would receive 25% "of the net commission" from certain sales if they occurred within a limited time after the divoree. When a sale occurred the parties dlsagreed on how to define "net commission": the wife contended that it meant the commission received by the company, but the husband contended that it meant only his share of it. The wife sought discovery in support of her…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rockstad v. EriksonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- DeYonge v. Nana/MarriottAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- RODERER v. DashAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Shea v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Retirement & BenefitsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- del Rosario v. ClareAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- State of Alaska, DHSS, OCS v. Zander B & Kelly B. (Foster Parents)Alaska Supreme Court · 2020
- Olivera v. Rude-OliveraAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Easley v. EasleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Edney v. EdneySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.