Legal Opinion

State v. Connley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 14, 1978No. 2PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Chief Justice.

The assignments of error which defendant brings forward challenge the admission of certain portions of the State’s evidence and the court’s instructions to the jury.

We first consider defendant’s contention that the trial judge committed prejudicial error by permitting State’s witness Victor Holdren, a special agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, to testify about statements which defendant made to him in the emergency room at Duke Medical Center between 4:00 and 5:00 a.m. on 15 November 1976. These statements, the substance of which Holdren related to the jury,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. LarrimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. RinckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. HeptinstallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API