Legal Opinion

State v. Heptinstall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 7, 1983No. 304A82PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

Defendant raises three questions: whether the trial court erred in finding defendant competent to proceed to trial, in refusing to conduct a new hearing on defendant’s competency after he testified, and in placing on defendant the burden of proving his insanity at the time of the incidents giving rise to the charges at issue. We conclude no error was committed and defendant received a fair trial.

Mrs. Rachel Albritton, a resident of the Lizzie community of Greene County, 1 was found by a neighbor in the yard of her home on 11 July 1981. She had been beaten and stabbed, but she…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. PropstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. MizeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. StatenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API