Legal Opinion
Tudor Fashions Ltd. v. Romney
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 5, 1986No. 86 Civ. 3163 (GLG)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge:
The plaintiffs in this action, Tudor Fashions Ltd. (“Tudor”) and David Meryl, Inc. (“David Meryl”) seek what is commonly known as a Boys Markets injunction, enjoining the defendant Blouse, Skirt & Sportswear Workers’ Union, Local 23-25, International Ladies Garment Workers Union (“the Union”) from striking or otherwise interfering with the business of the plaintiffs. The Court is now prepared to rule on this matter, both parties having declined the Court’s invitation to hold an evidentiary hearing. The plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief is denied pursuant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gateway Coal Co. v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kansas City Southern Transport Co. v. Teamsters Local Union 41Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Vittoria Corp. v. New York Hotel & Motel Trades CouncilDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998