Legal Opinion
Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v. Tritech Microelectronics International, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 7, 2001No. Nos. 99-1558, 99-1559 and 00-1006PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
On a motion for partial' summary judgment, the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas determined that OPTi Inc.’s (OPTi’s) and TriTech Microelectronics International, Inc.’s (TriTech’s) accused devices literally infringe Crystal Semiconductor Corporation’s (Crystal’s) U.S. Patent Nos. 4,746,899 (’899 patent) and 5,220,483 (’483 patent). See Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v. OPTi, Inc., No. A 97-CA-026 SS (W.D.Tex. Apr. 20, 1999). After the close of evidence but before the case went to the jury, the district' court granted judgment as a matter of law…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- In Re Seagate Technology, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Synqor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Georgetown Rail Equipment Co. v. Holland L.P.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Astra Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.