Legal Opinion
Synqor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 13, 2013No. 2011-1191, 2011-1192, 2011-1194, 2012-1070, 2012-1071, 2012-1072PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Chief Judge.
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted SynQor, Inc. (SynQor) partial summary judgment of infringement against nine power converter manufacturers (Defendants) on U.S. Patents Nos. 7,072,190 ('190 Patent); 7,272,021 ('021 Patent); 7,564,702 ('702 Patent); 7,558,083 ('083 Patent); and 7,269,034 ('034 Patent). Specifically the District Court determined the “isolation” limitations of the asserted claims of the '190 Patent, '021 Patent, '702 Patent, and '083 Patent appear in Defendants’ products. SynQor, Inc. v. Artesyn Techs., Inc. (Claim…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Summit 6, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Virnetx, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Eko Brands, LLC v. Adrian Rivera Maynez Enters.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Versata Software, Inc. v. Sap America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- The Dow Chemical Company v. Nova Chemicals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.