Legal Opinion
Georgetown Rail Equipment Co. v. Holland L.P.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 1, 2017No. 2016-2297PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACH, Circuit Judge.
Following a claim construction ruling adverse to Appellant Holland L.P. (“Holland”), a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (“District Court”) found that Holland infringed Ap-pellee Georgetown Rail Equipment Company’s (“Georgetown”) U.S. Patent 7,616,-329 (“the ’329 patent”) and awarded Georgetown lost profits. The District Court later approved an additional award of enhanced damages based on a finding of willful infringement. Holland appeals the District Court’s conclusions as to claim construction, willful infringement, and enhanced…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Allergan Sales, LLC v. Sandoz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Huawei Techs., Co. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Arctic Cat Inc. v. Gep Power Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Sionyx, LLC v. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.