Littlefield v. Schaefer
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbbott, Justice
in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, GONZALEZ, HECHT, SPECTOR and OWEN, Justices, join.
In this case, we consider whether a six-paragraph release printed in minuscule typeface on the front of a one-page “Release and Entry Form” for motorcycle racing satisfies the fair notice requirement of conspieuousness. The trial court enforced the release and granted summary judgment against the plaintiffs, survivors of the deceased motorcycle racer who signed the release. The court of appeals affirmed. Because the release is not conspicuous, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the case…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Page Petroleum, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Ethyl Corp. v. Daniel Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Cate v. Dover Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- McCarthy Well Co. v. St. Peter Creamery, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Allied Finance Co. v. Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Lawrence v. CDB Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Storage & Processors, Inc. v. ReyesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- American Airlines Employees Federal Credit Union v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Arthur's Garage, Inc. v. Racal-Chubb Security Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
- Segal v. Emmes Capital, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.